« De-Scent into Madness | Main | Net Loss »

March 01, 2005

Bush and Kids: Standing Small

Jonathan Rowe and I wrote an article for Alternet today comparing the Bush Administration's feeble response to the childhood obesity epidemic with the stronger response in Europe.

Want Congress to crack down on junk food marketing to kids? Send emails to your Members of Congress in support of the Parent's Bill of Rights. Click here: http://actionstudio.org/?go=1201.

Here's the article we wrote for Alternet.

http://www.alternet.org/story/21369/

Bush and Kids: Standing Small
by Jonathan Rowe and Gary Ruskin

President Bush may be asserting friendship with "Old Europe," as Donald Rumsfeld, his defense secretary, famously called it. But it is no secret that the Bush administration holds that part of the world in less than high regard. Time magazine reported that the Bush people frequently call their European allies "Euro-wimps."

Well, guess what? When it comes to standing up for kids, those "Euro-wimps" have shown a lot of guts of late. The Bush people, to put it politely, haven't.

For those who have been out of the cultural loop, the U.S. marketing industry has launched an all-out war on kids. It is saturating their lives with come-ons for junk food, junk-entertainment, junk anything. Not coincidentally kids have become hosts to an epidemic of marketing-related diseases: obesity, type-II diabetes, a general inability to focus their own attention.

On top of that, there is chronic strife and tension in American homes as kids whine and nag for things they've been seduced to want. Market research companies actually teach corporations how to tap this "nag factor."

Parents do their best to cope. Many have gotten rid of their TVs. But the commercial seductions are everywhere now, even in the schools. The dominant institution in our society – the corporation – has injected itself into the relationship between parents and their own kids in a major way. Parents can't fight this battle by themselves. They need some help.

One would think that the Bush administration, with its family values and macho swagger, would be eager for the challenge. Instead it has cut and run. Tommy Thompson, the former secretary of health and human services, actually stood before the Grocery Manufacturers Association – the main lobby for the junk food industry – and urged them to "go on the offensive" against critics. By that he means people who think parents, and not corporations, should guide the eating habits of children.

As for President Bush, he has said and done very little on the issue. The administration has talked about exercise, which is fine as far as it goes. But the thought of whipping kids through calisthenics, just to burn off the extra calories that the junk food purveyors are pushing at them, is grotesque to say the least. Are kids today really just consumption machines at the service of Coke et al.?

For a long time, Europeans thought that childhood obesity was an American problem. But as marketing has gone global, so too have the pathologies connected with it. According to the International Obesity Task Force, childhood obesity has "increased steadily" in Europe during the last two to three decades. Close to one in five school-age children in the European Union are overweight.

Unlike the Bush administration, however, the Europeans aren't cowering from the task. On Jan. 1, 2005 Ireland banned television advertising for fast food and candy. John Reid, the U.K. health secretary, has said he will call for a ban or restrictions on junk food marketing to children if the marketers don't show some self-control. And Markos Kyprianou, the European Health Commissioner, has drawn the line in the sand. "I would like to see the [food] industry not advertising directly to children any more," he told the Financial Times last month.

The food industry must take responsibility for its own behavior, Kyprianou said. But "if this doesn't produce satisfactory results, we will proceed to legislation." He gave the industry a deadline of one year.

Kyprianou and his colleagues have faced plenty of industry pressure, just as public officials do here. The difference is they are standing up to it.

Political courage is seen in the willingness to be tough with your friends. For Democrats, that means primarily organized labor. For Republicans, it means big business; and the commercial assault on children is a case in point. The junk food industry has been among the administration's biggest supporters. Among those who bundled $200,000 contributions to the Bush/Cheney 2004 campaign were high executives or lobbyists for Coca-Cola, Safeway, Florida Crystals (a big sugar company) and Altria, which is majority owner of Kraft Foods.

Those who bundled $100,000 included executives or lobbyists from U.S. Sugar Corp., Nestle USA, Coca-Cola Enterprises and Yum Brands, which owns Taco Bell and KFC.

In his State of the Union address, President Bush told Congress, "Over the next several months, on issue after issue, let us do what Americans have always done, and build a better world for our children and our grandchildren." If the president really means what he says, he might start by expelling junk food from the nation's public schools, and instructing his Federal Trade Commission to tell the junk food marketers to butt out of the relationship between parents and their kids.

We'll see whether the president walks his talk, or whether he just keeps caving to the big shots in the junk food industry.

Posted by Gary Ruskin at March 1, 2005 09:16 AM

Comments

Dear Jonathan & Gary;

Here's the email form that I sent through the site to my reps and senators from Washingtom State. I hope they enjoy it. Do ya'll have any feedback for me? Let me know what you think...

Nikki Monacelli
beephello@sisna.com
(509) 238-1500


Dear Member of Congress:

I want YOU to help stop the commercial assault on our nation's children!

Kids today are suffering from an epidemic of marketing-related diseases, such as obesity; type 2 diabetes, alcoholism and eating disorders, while millions will eventually die from the marketing of tobacco when they grow older. Did you know that it is now estimated that 1 in 3 children born in the year 2000 will develop diabetes? Did you know that these children are now expected to have a shorter life span than that of their parents’? My son was born in the year 2000. I need your help.

Corporate marketers aggressively promote damaging values to children, such as materialism, violence, addiction and anti-social behavior. It’s not a fair fight. MacDonald’s spent in excess of $1.2 billion in advertising 1999. That same year, our government spent a lowly $2 million promoting produce. Annually, the average American child will be exposed to 10,000 ads for junk and fast food, including candy, soda (aka: liquid candy), chips and highly sugared breakfast cereals. Even if parents ate every single meal with their child for a year, that would only give parents 1,000 chances to convey the messages of proper nutrition. They still win 10:1!

I want you to support THE PARENTS’ BILL OF RIGHTS because even in our public schools, our kids are getting the wrong messages about how to be healthy. Financially strapped public school systems around the country are using food service companies like Sodexo. They are allowing the fast food chains to peddle their poison. They’re “partnering” with Coca-Cola and PepsiCo for “pouring rights” to make up their budget shortfalls that are the result of a lowering of the percentage of our property tax dollars devoted to public education. They refuse to teach or even model basic nutrition, healthy food choices, and wise shopping practices.

Why are our children going to die younger? Scientists give us the answer: it’s the food they eat! Here are the culprits: junk foods loaded with cheaply added sugars; fast foods processed beyond recognition and stuffed with fat; meat that’s pumped full of hormones, pesticides and antibiotics; and produce grown far from home, raised in chemical soil, altered to dazzle the eye rather than the palate and made solely to withstand the rigors of long distance transportation. And then to add insult to injury, we’ve allowed our public schools to further promote the sickening of our kids by inviting these mega- food corporations, (whose interests are not our kids’ health but of their financial profit only), inside so that they not only promote their products to a captive audience who is legally required to attend, but are also given exclusive rights to sell their “bad burgers” and “liquid candy” ect… often in the guise of meeting the students’ nutritional requirements. And they can even financially punish school district for failing to meet sales quotas!

What about personal responsibility, you might ask? Many of these food companies say that they make nutritional information about their products available on-line. But only 50% of American household had Internet access 2000. And the majority of households without access fall into the lower socioeconomic class; precisely to whom much of their marketing targets. One cannot stress using personal responsibility and then not give parents the tools with which to make informed decisions. And, since they directly target minors who by nature are less informed and less mature than adults, the argument for personal responsibility fails.

Therefore, I strongly urge you to support THE PARENTS’ BILL OF RIGHTS (http://www.commercialalert.org/pbor.pdf), to restore to parents some control over the damaging commercial influences on children's lives.

Please help my son and his friends live a long, healthy life, and prevent their predicted early deaths. Go to http://www.commercialalert.org/pbor.pdf right now!

Your Constituent,

Nikki Monacelli

Posted by: nikki monacelli at March 7, 2005 10:50 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?