« Bad Portents for the Privacy Invaders | Main | Childhood Obesity and What to Do About It »

March 14, 2005

Channel One Stumbles Due to Financial Woes, Old TVs and Opposition

channelone.gifAdvertising Age reported today that Channel One has run into a multitude of troubles: “Its equipment is badly in need of an upgrade, advertisers are fleeing, critics are declaring they want to put it out of business, and the top executive, one of the founders, is leaving.”

Channel One is a company that uses the schools to advertise to captive audiences of about eight million children in about 12,000 schools across the country. It was founded by Chris Whittle in 1990, and is currently owned by Primedia, Inc.

“Channel One’s repugnant business model of forcing children to watch ads in school is failing.” said Gary Ruskin, executive director of Commercial Alert, a nonprofit organization that opposes the commercialization of education. “This is just the latest instance of the rejection of the commercial culture and its spread into the schools.”

Tell your governor and state legislators to enact a law baning Channel One from your state's schools. Click here.

“Parents are fed up with corporations interfering with their relationship with their own children,” Ruskin said. “Across the country, people are finally coming to realize that pushing advertising at schoolchildren is intolerable, outrageous and wrong.” Some examples are the disintegration of the ZapMe! Corp, the defeat of Time-Warner’s plans to put ads on CNN Student News, and the removal of soda pop or other junk food marketers in California, Texas, Maine, Arkansas, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, Nashville, New York, Oakland, Philadelphia, San Francisco and Seattle, among other places.

Americans are increasingly turning against the commercial culture. Overwhelming majorities of Americans are sick of advertisers efforts to dangle an ad in front of us at every waking moment. According to a Yankelovich Partners poll last year, 60% of Americans have a “much more negative opinion of marketing and advertising now than a few years ago,” 61% of Americans “feel the amount of marketing and advertising is out of control,” 65% feel “constantly bombarded with too much advertising and marketing, ”and 65% “think there should be more limits and regulations on marketing and advertising.” (To read the poll, go to http://www.commercialalert.org/Yankelovich.pdf.)

Commercial Alert is a national nonprofit organization whose mission is to keep the commercial culture within its proper sphere, and to prevent it from exploiting children and subverting the higher values of family, community, environmental integrity and democracy. For more information, see our website at: http://www.commercialalert.org.

-30-

Today’s article in Advertising Age follows.

Channel One hits bump, losing ads and top exec
In-school TV network often targeted by critics hurt as Kellogg, Kraft shy away due to kid obesity debate
By Claire Atkinson

Its equipment is badly in need of an upgrade, advertisers are fleeing, critics are declaring they want to put it out of business, and the top executive, one of the founders, is leaving.

Channel One, once proclaimed by its founder Chris Whittle as "a good business" that wouldn't work "unless it makes sense to the sponsors," no longer seems to work for some of its key advertisers.

Primedia's latest financial results show the extent of the network's problems attracting advertisers. In a year that saw overall U.S. ad spending up by 10%, according to TNS Media Intelligence, Primedia's Education segment, dominated by Channel One, saw ad revenue fall 12.3% for the year to $39.1 million. During the fourth quarter 2004, a major holiday selling period, ad revenue was down 12.1% to $13.1 million.

"The concern by certain advertisers about the obesity issue in schools caused them to stop or reduce advertising in schools," said Primedia in the full year results released Feb. 28. A Kraft Foods spokeswoman said Kraft has not advertised on Channel One since it enacted its policy to eliminate all in-school marketing in July of 2003.

Last week the company anointed Judy Harris as president-CEO of Channel One. Ms. Harris starts on April 4 and replaces outgoing Jim Ritts, the last executive with ties to Channel One founder Mr. Whittle.

"We took a big hit from Kellogg and Kraft," said Mr. Ritts, who went on to say, "future revenues are going to come." Food marketers are reorienting their messaging toward health, he said. A spokesman said ad revenue would be up in the first quarter.

raising the profile

New York-based Ms. Harris plans to be "highly visible" to advertisers over the next few weeks as she makes the rounds with outgoing chief Mr. Ritts. She has her work cut out for her. The network is hardly high profile at the media agencies. Aaron Cohen, senior VP-director of national broadcast at Horizon Media, New York, said: "I haven't seen a sales effort by Channel One in the longest time. I can't remember the last time we were approached by Channel One."

The service, now 15 years old, operates by providing schools free TV equipment, including a satellite dish, monitor and VCR. The network broadcasts two minutes of ads during a 12-minute daily show reaches 8 million secondary-school children in 370,000 classrooms. That reach has remained fairly constant in the last few years. An ad-supported Web site, Channelone.com, is also available.

But its very presence in classrooms has drawn the ire of critics, including Commercial Alert, a Portland Ore.-based consumer advocacy group, which has pushed the charge against Channel One to the top of its agenda. "The coalition which opposes the presence of Channel One is bigger and stronger than ever before. We expect to run them out of every school in the country," said Executive Director Gary Ruskin.

Jim Metrock, president of Obligation, a Birmingham, Ala.-based child advocacy organization, charges on his Web site that any school district that has a contract with Channel One is "not serious about education * and they are inviting the wrath of parents and other citizens who don't want school time replaced with commercials for junk food and sleazy movies."

no plans to sell

Ms. Harris reports to Primedia chairman Dean Nelson, rather than CEO Kelly Conlin, which some observers posit means the company is considering a sale. Mr. Nelson strongly denied that speculation, and said that Channel One is still and always has been profitable, and that the company would not have recruited Ms. Harris if it had plans to sell.

Channel One's ad declines date back years. In 2002 ad revenue at Channel One was $50.2 million, that dropped by 11% to $44.6 million in 2003. Primedia once packaged its teen titles together with Channel One, but Seventeen and its related titles were sold to Hearst for $184.2 million in May 2003. Ms. Harris was not yet sure whether there were other cross-company packaging opportunities.

A second headache for Ms. Harris will be overseeing the company's digital upgrade. Some observers close to the company report Primedia has put off upgrading the network as long as possible. A handful of schools are testing a new digital format, but an insider said the board has not yet given the green light to doing a full upgrade, and won't address it for at least another 6 months.

"It would be very difficult for Primedia to justify the capital investment if the ad revenue is down," noted one executive close to the company.

Primedia, when it was known as K-III, purchased Channel One from Whittle Communications in 1994 for $250 million, based on annual revenue of $70 million and $20 million in operating profit. At the time, K-III expected to spend $100 million over the next decade on upkeep and technology for its 12,000 satellite dishes, 6,000 miles of cable and 350,000 classroom TVs, according to published reports.

Primedia executives said Channel One is quite capable of supporting its infrastructure and any required changes with its current revenue stream. However, Mr. Nelson did say Ms. Harris had already been in touch with foundations willing to underwrite the cost of programming, and a spokesman said one option is to bring in a partner to supply TV equipment to schools in exchange for promotion.

The estimated cost of digital transition could be anywhere between $4 million to $6 million according to an executive familiar with digital upgrades, and replacing TV equipment could add millions more. Said Mr. Ritts, "We are at the beginning of digitizing content. We are in the pilot phase of the first 15 to 20 schools." He declined to say what kind of investment was necessary to convert the network, but said it was nowhere near the original start-up investment, reported to be around $250 million at the time.

Posted by Gary Ruskin at March 14, 2005 10:49 AM

Comments

Gary,

Very good! And by the way, my son will be starting public school this year, and we've decided to move to Portland for his education (and a lot of other stuff); SES.

I'm getting rather passionate about this issue, and want to become involved more, and at the local level there. Any ideas? We're going to be there 7/1. Thanks in advance. I bet you're busy and greatly value your time.

Nikki Monacelli
Chattaroy,WA

Posted by: nikki at March 15, 2005 06:45 PM

Of course, there is more everyone can do on the local level. If you or anyone else wants to take action in your community, just call the Commercial Alert office at 503-235-8012.

Posted by: Marnie at March 16, 2005 07:09 AM

I've been a substitute teacher for many years. My first run-in with Channel One was a couple of years ago. The first thing I noticed was how intellectually-vapid the reporting was (imagine CNN, but dumbed-down even further). Then came the ads: junk food, sitcoms, products no one needs.

The funniest thing was that the students pay more attention to the ads than to the crappy news portion. The show is so phony, so stupid, most kids don't bother to watch it. It's a waste of time.

I can't take a Channel One school seriously. Sorry. If a district is willing to make kids watch television for a few extra bucks, it doesn't take education seriously enough.

Posted by: Forrest Gabitsch at March 31, 2005 02:12 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?